Australian Back Care Doesn't Measure Up

< BACK TO HEALTH starstarstarstarstar   Community - Health Press Release
9th February 2010, 11:39am - Views: 647





People Feature The George Institute 1 image

People Feature The George Institute 2 image



MEDIA RELEASE

TUESDAY 9 FEBRUARY 2010


BACK CARE DOESN’T MEASURE UP


According to national guidelines, the best care for acute lower back pain is simple: stay active, avoid

bed rest and take regular simple analgesics such as paracetamol. However new research has found

that only 20% of patients receive this simple treatment approach. Instead many are referred for

unnecessary imaging and prescribed more complex medicines such as ibuprofen. 


In Australia, acute low back pain is primarily managed by GPs, physiotherapists and chiropractors.

New research conducted by The George Institute has revealed that the care received by patients

does not align with best practice recommendations in international evidence-based guidelines.

Importantly, this care may not be providing the best outcomes for patients and is likely to be

contributing to the high cost of back pain in Australia.


“We found a great difference between usual care and what is recommended in guidelines for treating

acute lower back pain. For example, guidelines discourage the use of imaging, but more than one-

quarter of patients were referred to imaging. Most patients did not receive the recommended advice

even though this is inexpensive and universally recommended for all patients. The challenge is how

we change practice so that it aligns with the evidence”, said author Professor Chris Maher, Director of

musculoskeletal research at The George Institute.


“One issue is the internet; it contains an interesting mix of information and misinformation. As a result

treating back pain for clinicians is more difficult than ever because of common misconceptions

patients bring with them to the consultation. A potential step in rectifying the situation is addressing

these misconceptions with key public health messages.”


Low back pain is the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal condition in Australia¹, estimated to

cost up to $1billion per annum with indirect costs exceeding $8billion². In the United States, the direct

cost of treatment is over $50billion. The issues between care and guidelines have also been found in

                                                

1

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2000: the seventh biennial health report of the

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 7th ed. Canberra: AIHW, 2000.

2

Walker B, Muller R, Grant W. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pacific Journal of

Public Health 2003;15(2):79-87.

3. Schofield DJ, Shrestha RN, Passey ME, Earnest A, Fletcher SL. Chronic disease and labour force participation

among older Australians. MJA 2008; 189 (8): 447-450


People Feature The George Institute 3 image

the United States, and highlight concern over what strategies are necessary to educate GPs in

providing guideline-based care.


Researchers assessed the care of 3533 patients who visited their GP regarding a new case of low

back pain. Treatment was mapped against international evidence-based guidelines for the

management of lower back pain. The research also reviewed the impact of the introduction of

guidelines in 2004, which showed that the treatment trends have not improved over time.


Paracetamol is endorsed in guidelines because it is a safe and cost-effective treatment. However the

true efficacy of paracetamol for a new episode of low back pain is unclear, and authors note that

perhaps because of this uncertainty only 20% of patients with new low back pain are prescribed or

recommended paracetamol.


“We know that most people with back pain do not take paracetamol correctly in fact, less than 10% of

patients with a new episode of low back pain take paracetamol regularly up to the daily recommended

dose”, said Professor Maher.


Researchers are now investigating the effects of paracetamol among 1650 patients from GP

practices in the Sydney metropolitan area, and will follow patients’ recovery for three months. This

study will find out whether taking paracetamol regularly is more effective than taking paracetamol on

an as-required basis. The results of this new study will have immediate implications for clinical

management of low back pain. 


“If the findings demonstrate that a regular course of paracetamol is effective in speeding recovery, the

cost-savings to individual patients and to our healthcare system will be very significant, especially for

the 4 million people with back pain in Australia”, added Professor Maher.


The new study is being conducted at The George Institute with colleagues at the University of Sydney

and University of New South Wales.


###ENDS###


For further information, please contact:

Emma Orpilla – Public Relations, The George Institute for International Health

Tel: +612 8238 2424/ Mobile: +61410 411 983

Fax: +612 9657 0301/ email: eorpilla@george.org.au



The George Institute is a world renowned health and medical research institute, focused on the

prevention and management of chronic disease and injury. The George conducts high-impact

research across a broad health landscape and is a respected voice among global policy makers. The

George has conducted major global applied research projects and innovative community-based

programs from bases in Australia, China and India. In 2009, the Institute celebrates a decade of

discovery, innovation and impact. www.thegeorgeinstitute.org







news articles logo NEWS ARTICLES
Contact News Articles |Remove this article